Showing posts with label Woodgrange Methodist Church. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Woodgrange Methodist Church. Show all posts

Woodgrange Road developments

Friday, 26 January 2024

What, a century ago, was Forest Gate’s thriving shopping centre (see here) and here) on Woodgrange Road, is planned to be host to over 300 new or refurbed flats on four different sites. We’ve reported on some of these developments before, but now – five years later – we bring the latest on the status of Warden’s Reach (the old Barry’s block), Durning Hall, the Methodist church and Donald Hunter House.

Recently there has been, or soon will be, significant changes in the ownership and status of each development, but relatively little concrete evidence of real progress in providing new homes for people, in all but one of them.

Warden’s Reach (39a-49a Woodgrange Road)

This project has been considerably delayed since planning permission for it was first granted in 2017 (see here) to developers, London Ironworks, who planned the site as a private, commercial development. Originally scheduled for construction in 2018-2019, it is, four years on, only now nearing completion.

Having gained planning permission, London Ironworks sold it on to Gateway Housing Association for an unidentified sum. Gateway made some changes to the proposal reflecting its new status as a social housing project, and then sold it on to Latimer Homes – another social housing provider - and part of the Clarion Group, the country’s largest owner of “affordable homes”. Clarion has a history stretching back to the 19th century, when its founder, William Sutton, bequeathed what would be £230m in today’s terms for the construction of “affordable homes”.

The nearly-completed Warden’s Reach comprises of two blocks, Holly House and Epping House, which between them consist of 78 flats – a mix of one-bed, two-bed and three-bed units. They are mainly of the shared-ownership model, the purchase of which is largely restricted to first time buyers with relatively modest incomes.

Typically, purchasers will “buy” 25% of the value of a flats and “rent” the other 75%, with an option to purchase a larger share, over time, as their income allows. This could mean initially finding a deposit of 5% of the total price, borrowing 20% on a mortgage and paying rent for the other 75%.

Warden's Reach - nearing completion

Although branded as “affordable”, prices are not cheap. The full price of one-bed flats is between £364k-£372k, of two-bed apartments from £480k - £632k and for the three-bed accommodation, £665k.

It would cost £158k, up-front, to secure the initial 25% purchase of a typical £632k 2-bed flat. The monthly outgoings would then likely be £2,050, consisting: £950 mortgage repayment, £850 rent (for the 75% not purchased) and £250 service charges.

The flats are being sold via a pop-up estates office on Woodgrange Road, facing Sebert Road. According to the Warden’s Reach website about a third of the flats were sold within the first two months of them becoming available for sale.

The ground floor of Warden’s Reach is for retail and Latimer has recently sought a purchaser of it, for around £5m. The company has already secured a 30-year lease with supermarket chain Lidl for the greater part of it, with a shorter lease to Costa, for a coffee shop and a very short lease to a local retail beauty outlet. The retail units are expected to be up and running by April this year.

Donald Hunter House

This is the eight-storey pink-clad building at the foot of Woodgrange Road, above the library and Iceland store. Following WW2 bomb damage to the area, the Post Office constructed an office block in 1958, Telephone House, as a sub-regional headquarters of their then telephony arm. Following restructuring and privatisation of the telephone service - rebranded BT - the building became surplus to requirements and was sold off in 1999. We have previously featured this property here.

The old Telephone House

It was bought by Peabody Unite plc (a joint venture between the Peabody Housing Association and the Unite Group, providers of key worker and student accommodation) to provide accommodation for upto 256 key workers (mainly hospital and education staff), and renamed Donald Hunter House, after a local well-known doctor.

The accommodation was poor, cramped, expensive and inconvenient for hospital staff getting to work, so they sought other more suitable and often less expensive accommodationthe elsewhere. As a result, it was under-occupied. In 2014 Newham council was subject to two court judgements. One accepted the fact that the building was unsuitable for children,  because of its lack of communual play facilities. The other forced the council to introduce a variation in designated usage, to effectively permit the property to house economically inactive homeless families!

The accommodation was subsequently purchased by an off-shore company, Guernsey-based Stratos Holdings for £15.7m.  As an off-shore entity, it is unlikely to pay UK taxes on its earnings. Stratos is,  in turn, owned by a huge Luxembourg-based company which specialises is property acquisition, the ownership of which is also “off-shored”, to avoid tax liability.

That Luxembourg company - Grand City Properties S.A. – is one of the largest residential property companies in Europe, with over £11bn in assets and profits in excess of £600m in 2021 alone. The founder of this is Yakir Gubay, who has a net worth of £3.7bn, and according to Forbes, is the world’s 785th richest man.

Stratos sub-let Donald Hunter House to Omega lettings, itself a subsidiary of a company called Tando, a commercial company which specialises in supplying accommodation to local authorities in which to house homeless families, at some profit to themselves. 

Donald Hunter house, above the library and Iceland

Because of a quirk in funding arrangements, Tower Hamlets council is able to pay more rent to the landlords for this type of accommodation than Newham, so Omega let the property to them, with Newham having to pick up the social care and education costs of its Tower Hamlets homeless residents.

Omega charged local councils upto £70 per night to house families there in totally unsuitable accommodation. Despite this, hosting councils (Newham in this case) have fewer rights to clamp down on unhealthy and environmentally unsound conditions in properties like Donald Hunter House than they do in regular private or socially rented accommodation. Children are forced to live in properties with broken lifts and stairwells hosting drug use and other anti-social behaviour and there is little the local authority can do to impose improvement orders on the owners/managers.

Following Grenfell in 2017 Donald Hunter House was identified as a vulnerable building and remained so, untreated, for a further two years.

Donald Hunter House, unsurprisingly, gained a poor reputation, and attracted adverse press attention, for having inadequate and cramped facilities, sub-standard maintenance and poor public hygiene (vermin and flea infestation etc.).

In an  effort to address all of these unsatisfactory conditions, Newham Council purchased the property in June 2023 for £31m - twice the price Stratos paid less than a decade earlier. Stratos incurred no Capital Gains Tax liability (a saving of over £3m), because of its off-shore status. Newham’s purchase, however, gives it the ability to house its own rather than Tower Hamlets’ homeless families in the block, for the future.

Newham has subsequently committed £1.4m to address some of its most pressing needs (damaged windows and roof etc) and improve the lot of its residents. This expenditure is not sufficient to enable a full refurbishment of the block, that may await the outcome of the council’s consideration of potential longer-term full redevelopment proposals, but should ensure more satisfactory accommodation for the families living within it.

The homeless families living in Donald Hunter House are often targetted for public absue as scroungers etc, while its long term owners (Stratos/Grand City) and site managers (Omega/Tando) have  provided sub-standard accommodation and remain largely hidden behind a complex web of ownership, to extract millions in tax-free profit from the public purse.

Donald Hunter House is not unique in Britain, it is symptomatic of a wider issue. Local authorities in the UK spent £1.7billion on temporary accommodation in 2021. The profiteering within the sector by firms like Omega/Tando/Stratos/Grand City is a direct consequence of the contraction of social housing in the country over the last four decades.

(We would like to thank Lea Sitkin, a local resident and Social Scientist at Westminster University, for help with this section of the article. If anyone wishes to reach out and talk about temporary accommodation, she would be pleased to hear from you. She can be reached via L.Sitkin@westminster.ac.uk or via X (Twitter): @LeaMarikeSitkin)

Woodgrange Methodist church

This blog reported on the redevelopment proposals for the now-derelict church here, in March 20218. The original church was built on the site towards the end of the nineteenth century, but was destroyed by bombing during World War 11 (see here). It was subsequently rebuilt in the 1950’s but later faced a large turnover in membership with differing demands from the congregation for the buildings – to become less formal and more multi-purpose. 

The church before the hoardings went up

The Methodists, at a local and national level, began discussions over a decade ago on plans to redevelop the facility. They quickly concluded that the only way to pay for the modern multi-purpose, flexible church building they wanted would be to reduce the footprint of the church itself and build flats on the rest of the site. As we reported in 2018, Pigeon Investment Management – a Suffolk based company established in 2008 - agreed to develop the site and appointed Alaistair Watson of Broadchurch Asset Management to undertake local consultations for their proposals.

Pigeon established a subsidiary company, which later became Pigeon (Forest Gate) Ltd. This currently has two directors, William Stanton one of the founding directors of the parent company, who is a director of 33 other companies, some within the group and others not and Andrew Boyce, who appears to hold 50% of the shares in the Forest Gate company, He is not a member of the main Pigeon board, but is, however, a director of 32 other active companies.

Watson of Broadchurch, as we noted in 2018, was an unconvincing and poor advocate for both Pigeon and the proposed development. He told us that planning permission would be granted within 2-3 months and construction would take upto 18 months, meaning that the new flats and church would be open for business in early 2020! Four years on, we are waiting for the first brick to be removed from the old building.

Companies House records show that Watson has been associated with 45 companies over recent years; 18 have been dissolved, he has resigned from a futher 23 and is only currently active in the remaining four.

The Methodists’ and Pigeon’s proposed redevelopment sought to relocate the church building to the Osborne Road end of the site and build around 33 flats on a block reaching six stories high, at the Claremont Road side of it.

How the developers saw the site, post construction

The church itself was to feature a high spire, which would accommodatethe relocated Grade 2 listed Peter Peri statue of the “The Preacher” which currently adorns the wall of the existing church.

There was a great deal of to-ing and fro-ing between the developers and council over the proposals – extending to in excess of 150 documents - before planning permission was eventually granted in July 2020. This substantially agreed to the original proposals, but reducing the number of flats to be built to 31 and ensuring that there was a wider range of sizes of flats on the development.

The abandoned church has subsequently attracted squatters, anti-social behaviour and has been affected by at least two fires. In an effort to reduce this activity, hoardings have been placed around it for the last three years.

And they have not been productive years, as far as the site has been concerned,

We spoke to William Straton, the main Pigeon director associated with the Methodist church project. He told us that Pigeon pulled out of the deal about 18 months ago, because the numbers ceased to stack up for them. He said that the original deal was tight, in affordability terms, and that subsequent price rises in building material costs and interest rates had made it an unattractive project for them. He also indicated that the Methodist church had been difficult to deal with and that the project was one that with hindsight he regretted his involvement with. 

A CGI view from on high

Pigeon (Forest Gate) Ltd remains an active company and he is still its main director. It is, however, sitting on considerable losses incurred during the planning process for the Methodist church. The intention is to use this company as a vehicle to manage another, profit- making deal, change its name and offset those accrued profits against the Woodgrange Road losses. This is all perfectly lawful.

The approval for the planning application for the site expired in July 2023 and the planning department has confirmed there has been no new application for the site, nor a request to grant an extension for the original approval. All of which means that a new set of proposals will need to be submitted to permit any development on the site at all. That could be a lengthy process, given the requirement to undertake local public consultation for any new plans.

Meanwhile, Broadchurch, the company that undertook the first consulation, was liquidated in December 2023 at the request of its creditors, among which is HMRC, which was owed in excess of £100,000 by the company. 

We spoke with the Methodist church at its London District level and its has a new property manager who was able to confirm that there are currently no plans for the site, in terms of its immediate development. The church at local, regional and national level will “soon” be undertaking discussions to help determine its future.

This could clearly take some while; there then may be the disposal and sale of the site outright, or the appointment of developers to come up with new proposals for a new scheme, which in turn would need planning permission and a construction period.

So – we are looking at a likely minimum of five years before anything approaching a solution can be delivered for this eyesore. All highly undesirable for local residents, who will have suffered a Methodist shaped blot on the Forest Gate landscape for upto 15 years.

Durning Hall

Durning Hall is run by the Aston Mansfield charity, which has been in Newham for over 130 years, catering mainly for the needs of families and children. We have covered the history of Durning Hall on this site before (see here). The Hall and associated buildings are yet another post-war Forest Gate development in desperate need of replacement or renewal. Its website says that “without significant work, the site is financially unsustainable.” 

Durning Hall - financially unsustainable

The trustees of the charity hope that its redevelopment (running from the corner of Earlham Grove to, but not including, the Post Office delivery office, and along Woodgrange Road to, but not including, the Co-op) will mean that the charity can continue to work in Newham, providing resources to help it to support children, young people and families within the borough. As with the Methodist site, the theory is that the income raised by the residential development will pay for the not-for-profit work they wish to continue.

Following extensive consultations by Durning Hall, both before and during the pandemic, Newham council has granted planning permission for revised proposals for the site’s redevelopment. Durning Hall’s website states that they wish to “redevelop the site in partnership with an organisation with development expertise” and hope to appoint such a company by April this year. The expectation is that once started, the construction work will take at least three years.

There are indications that planning blight for the footprint of the site has already kicked in. Just this week, Malchem the chemists' was forced to vacate its premises and move 150 yards further south on Woodgrange Road, because Durning Hall would not grant them a lease extension. Whether the now vacant shop stays boarded up or becomes host to pop up shops remains to be seen, but the writing is on the wall and no building within the perimeter of the scheme is likely to experience a facelift until construction work commences. 

It is to be hoped that Durning Hall apply greater due diligence and find more suitable partners than the Methodist church has, to date, for its Woodgrange Road building, or completion could be a long way off. The charity is at least more realistic in providing times scales for construction and completion of the project.

 

Tired looking shops on Woodgrange Road - to go!

The proposals are to construct 78 high quality homes, including 27 (35%) “affordable” ones – though no indicative prices for any have yet been supplied. They also include provision for community facilities, incorporating a “Youth Enterprise Pop-up Space” a creative children’s playspace and four shops on Woodgrange Road, to replace those eight that will be demolished.

Although the Co-op and delivery office are not included in the plans, Newham has already designated those sites for re-development. It seems possible that once Lidl has opened 100 metres away, the Co-op will struggle to remain viable, which could will trigger a sell on of the the shop for further development. The delivery office has already been earmarked for sale and redevelopment by the Post Office – a company in desperate need to raise money to pay the costs of its scandalous treatment of sub-postmasters.

CGI view of how the development will look from Woodgrange Road

The extensive consultations around Durning Hall’s original accommodation proposals resulted in some modifications to them, which laid the basis for the planning consent granted. Originally Durning Hall wanted a 12-storey building on the site. That has been scaled back to a 10-storey, maximum, building on Woodgrange Road, gradually reducing to six storeys on Earlham Grove.

The view from Earlham Grove

The 78 homes will consist: 4 studio flats, 23 one-bed flats, 35 two-bed flats and 16 3-bed units. There will be a communual courtyard and a designated play area for 5 – 11 year olds. The development, consistent with council conditions, will be car-free, except for 3 disabled parking bays. There will, however, be a significant amount of cycle parking space.

There is no indication, at this stage, of the likely costs of the new flats that will be built.

Conclusion

The fate of some of these developments over the last decade has been almost a metaphor for the state of the country over the period. An essential need for all people has been hijacked by a combination of absentee greedy tax avoiding speculators and incompetent or ill-suited developers, fiddling and delaying in the pursuit of gain to the detriment of the local public realm and basic human requirements. It is to be hoped that the same fate does not befall the Durning Hall site.

Redevelopment proposals for Woodgrange Methodist Church

Thursday, 15 March 2018


The congregation and pastors of Woodgrange Methodist church, together with the national hierarchy of the Methodist tradition have been working, for about 5 years,  on redevelopment plans for the site. These are at an advanced stage and subject to pre-planning consultation.

Architect view of how the new development
 would fit in to Woodgrange Road - nb, this
assumes the proposals for 39a-49a -
opposite - go ahead as approved


The existing buildings, although only about 60 years old, are looking tired and unfit for purpose, so the Methodists have appointed a series of external professionals to help them re-develop their physical position within the local community.

They held two consultation sessions - totalling eight hours - within the church premises, over a cold February weekend. We went along, and this is what we found.

The consultation event was fronted by Alaistair Watson of Broadchurch Asset Management - about whom, more much later.

The proposal is to knock down the existing church and supporting buildings and replace them by a new church and around 33 flats. The consultation leaflet said that the proposed development will provide:

  • a new high quality visible church on the northern side of the site
  • variety of community spaces
  • around 33 new homes
  • retail accommodation
and that "The site has been designated as suitable for residential-led mixed use development (enabling the Church) in the Borough's Local Plan."

Bird's eye view of how the proposed
development would appear


Mr Watson promised copies of the display boards on show at the consultation event to share with readers of this blog.  He has failed to honour this commitment, despite repeated reminders and requests. As and when he chooses to do so, we will happily update this post and add them to it.

Only about 25 people had attended the consultation event half way through its opening hours, so few members of the local community will have had much of a chance to see what is proposed for one of the focal points of the local community.

The original Methodist church, built at the
 conclusion of construction of the Woodgrange
estate - in the early 1890's. The new proposals
seek a similarly dominating tower/spire


 In summary, the church's physical position on the footprint of the existing  site will be switched from abutting Claremont Road, to being adjacent to Osborne Road. The church will have a tall spire/tower - as the original church on the site had, before it was bombed during WW2. The spire, itself, would be dominated by a huge cross.

This literally towers over other buildings in the area, and may now be deemed out of character - even with the taller residential apartment buildings planned for the opposite side of Woodgrange Road (see here).

The original church, in ruins,
following bombing during WW2


The church, itself, will occupy about 50% of the land on the site - the other 50% will be devoted to housing. Mr Watson was frank - 'it is the sale of the flats that will pay for the rebuilding of the church'. But, the proposals only anticipate that 6 of the proposed flats will be for 'social housing'. The other 27 would be for sale.
 
The consultation leaflet stated that further information about the proposed development could be found here. At the time of writing, this website offered no more information than the leaflet available at the consultation event, other than the information that "The site will be developed by Pigeon Investment Management."

Pigeon's website: www.pigeon.co.uk says:

Pigeon was established in 2008 and has assembled a management team with extensive knowledge of the regional property markets and a powerful combination of business and property skills.

Pigeon manages commercial and residential property on behalf of its investors with a projected end value of over £250m and is currently promoting land for over 15,000 dwellings for its land partners.

Herein lies a potential problem for both the developers (Pigeon and Broadchurch) and for would-be Newham Labour Mayoral hopeful Cllr Rokhsana Fiaz. Cllr Fiaz, in her manifesto for mayor plan, aims to get 50% of new-build homes in Newham under council ownership and let at fair rents.

The church, today, occupying space the
developers propose is used for 33 flats
- 80% for sale at market prices


Clearly both ambitions - the 80% flats for commercial sale proposals of the developers and 50% council-owned by the potential mayor - cannot be met, unless weasel words can be conjured up.

The rebuild proposals would see the church side of the development as a large multi-purpose space that could be used to host a number of community activities, and open up to make it an inviting facility for local community use.

The Grade 2 listed Peter Peri's sculpture, The Preacher, (see here for details), currently facing Woodgrange Road would be relocated to face the corner of Woodgrange and Osborne Roads in the new proposals.

Peter Peri's sculpture will be moved,
but remain as a significant feature of the
new church - under current proposals


There were a number of elderly members of the local congregation present at the consultation event and they are very keen on the proposals.  "We pray every day for their success" we were told. 

They were keen to point out that they do not want the new development to have walls or fences around it - both from a perspective of being welcoming to the local community, but also because they do not wish it to become a centre of anti-social behaviour (litter dumping, street drinking, needle discards etc).

Mr Watson said all concerned were working to what sounds like an incredibly ambitious time table. Planning permission within two-three months and project completion with about 18 months. The congregation would co-locate with the Manor Park Methodists for the duration.

Alaistair Watson and Broadchurch Asset Management

The consultation event was hosted by Mr Watson, in the name of Broadchurch Asset Management.

The company's name is a potentially misleading one, because in financial circles "Asset Management" companies are those who look after/invest large holdings of other people's money - like pension and sovereign wealth funds. Broadchurch is small beer - with almost no assets - either of its own, or apparently managing.

Alaistair Watson, 53, is the only current director of Broadchurch-am, which was established in 2013, and doesn't appear to have done much trading since. He has been involved with a string of other property companies (33 at the last count - though only currently active in 4) and has been involved with projects in Essex, the Isle of Wight (see ,here and here) and Suffolk, where he lives. He  appears to be a bit of a vintage car enthusiast (see here). 

Broadchurch, together with Pigeon, do, however, have plans for a significant development in Hadleigh in Suffolk - see here.

In 2005, under the name of Thamesgate Regeneration, Mr Watson managed a big and controversial development  in East Tilbury. It attracted a fair bit of press coverage, not least from The Guardian, due to its plans to build a 14,000-home new town on greenbelt land.

Colonnade Holdings, another company managed Mr Watson, has run a few successful projects in the Isle of Wight over the last decade or so. But he and this company didn’t have a good time of it when developing a shopping centre in Basildon in 2009, according to three separate reports in the local paper (see here, here and here).

Some of the filth currently outside the
church.  The congregation, and local
people want to see an end to this.
Mr Watson - please note
The congregation at Woodgrange Methodist church, and Forest Gate residents more generally, will be disappointed to hear that there were complaints were about filth, rubbish, graffiti and broken pavements in the area under development, causing accidents and discomfort, for which Mr Watson had to publicly apologise.


October 2018 update

A formal planning application for the redevelopment of the Woodgrange Methodist church was lodged at the end of September 2018. Full details can be found on the council's planning website, see here.

Below are some of the drawing submitted as part of the application. 

Comments about the application are sought by the council, via the site, above, with a closing date of 31 October 2018.

Some observations:

1. Five weeks does not seem long for the consultation process - particularly considering how minimal the first stage of consultation was - see above.

2. The diagrams below disguise the fact that if accepted, a key part of Forest Gate's main thoroughfare (the flats in this proposal and those in the boarded up shops opposite - whenever the developers get round to building) will switch from being effectively three floors high, to six floors high. This is a significant change to the nature of the area, which the council has failed to consult on, adequately.

3. As mentioned, above, weasel words have been conjured up to disguise the fact that the proposal falls considerably short of Newham's mayor's stated aim of ensuring all new housing developments in Newham are split 50:50 between commercially let and sold properties and those that are "affordable". The proposal, like the original consulted-on scheme, still envisages only 6 of the 33 homes being for "social housing", and 27 not (i.e about 18% social/affordable). 

4. All the evidence suggests that 3-bedroom accommodation presents the largest demand for housing in Newham. Only six of the proposed flats are 3-bed, nine are 2-bed and 18 are 1-bed.

5. The planning proposals envisages that the building costs of the development will be £10.5m, bringing the equivalent of 97 labour-years of work.

Ground floor plan

Church development plan's height in
comparison to agreed development
for 39a - 49a Woodgrange Road

Current building footprint (solid colour),
within site plans for new development (purple line)

Top view of proposed development

View from Claremont Road

View from Osborne Road

Woodgrange Road, looking east

Forest Gate during the Blitz

Friday, 31 July 2015


The most significant series of events of the last century to affect the constituent parts of Newham: East Ham and West Ham - including Forest Gate - were the World War 11 bombings.

The whole physical structure of the borough was transformed by the destruction caused. Everyone today "knows" that the East End was badly hit, that local people were "plucky" and that sporadic visits to the sites of destruction by royalty litter the folklore of the area.


Distinctive outline of the Thames
 made targeting East London
 easy for the Luftwaffe, even
 when the radar was rudimentary

No sane person can deny the extent of the destruction.  Anyone with half an eye on architectural styles can spot areas hit by bombs, where late nineteenth buildings have been replaced by post-war structures - the lower east side of Woodgrange Road simply being the most obvious local example.

Whole swathes of the borough - particularly in the south, on the banks of the Thames - where the strategically crucial docks and other war-related industries were located - were flattened by German bombers, as they sought to disable the British war effort and demoralise the local population.

But, relatively little reliable detail of the profound reconfiguration of our area actually survives.

There is no definitive, hit-by-hit history  of the bombing of London in general and Newham, in particular - just lots of fragments, that often don't correlate too well with each other.

Hundreds of books have been published about London, the war and enemy bombings and some give very compelling eye witness accounts of specific incidents, such as Cyril Marne's of the Dames Road trolley bus doodlebug of 1944, recently covered on this site, here. But there is no overarching comprehensive account publicly available.

A website www.bombsight.org was launched recently to much acclaim.  It locates all the main bomb hits of the Blitz (October 1940 - June 1941), and can be searched by post codes, offering very useful maps to site visitors.  But it only covers a fragment of the war and offers no detail of casualties, the impact of individual hits, photos of the bomb sites, or eye witness accounts - certainly not of the Forest Gate area. Hopefully, these will follow, as the site is developed, over time.

Some official records exist and are in the public domain. The former West Ham Council Civil Defence team published a summary of air raids on the borough, between 28 August 1940 and 8 May 1945. ARP (Air Raid Precaution - the civil defence organisation) records provide details of bomb hits, and they can be analysed by area. 

The War Graves Commission, in 1954, published a list of British civilian dead (including local people), West Ham Council produced its own roll of civilian remembrance from the war. 

Many of these records, however, are incomplete, and do not reconcile with each other. For example, the list of bomb hits obviously refers to the location of the dropped bomb, but the list of civilian dead is by the deceased's address, which is not necessarily where they were killed. 

It is not unreasonable to assume that when bombs fell in the early hours, in a particular road on a given day and people from that road were reported as having been killed on that day, that the deaths were as a result of the bomb in question.

But other people, with addresses elsewhere may have been in the area when a missile struck, and could have been killed, but they would not have been recorded as a victim of that bomb.

That was certainly the case of the Dames Road Doodlebug incident (see above). The eye witness account talks of several bodies being thrown about as the crowded trolley bus was blown up. By definition, most of those people were travelling and may not have lived in the immediate vicinity of the explosion. The civilian deaths would have been recorded by the home address and not the location of the explosion. 

Another dramatic example of this was probably the worst air raid to affect West Ham. It occurred on 10 October 1940.

Several hundred people, bombed out of their homes, gathered in the South Hallsville school, Canning Town, waiting for evacuation. The transport did not arrive and the school received a direct hit from a high explosive bomb.  The official council figure indicates that 73 people were killed and hundreds injured. 

To this day, survivors and their relatives are convinced that in fact many hundreds were actually killed, and the total number was hushed up, for fear of adversely affecting morale.

it is difficult to tell, because of the circumstances, many of those killed did not live in the vicinity of the school, so their deaths would have been recorded at the locations of their homes. It is unlikely, however, that a true total list of fatalities and casualties will ever be established.

This is the first of two articles on WW11 bombing in Forest Gate.  It attempts to bring together the various records and supplement them with surviving photographs and some eye-witness accounts of specific incidents.  It also reproduces some articles from the Stratford Express, which were heavily censored, extremely vague, and again, underestimated the numbers of deaths inflicted.


The opening paragraph of this article
 from the Stratford Express of 25 April
 1941 illustrates the censorship under
 which papers worked under, and how
 little real information readers could
 gain from them. We presume it refers
 to the Eric Road bombing, see below
 - but the road, or even the district are
 not mentioned and the copy is vague in
 the extreme. It reads: "We are now
 permitted to relate some incidents which
 occurred in a violent raid a few weeks ago
. It was more severe than any in the  vicinity
 for some months and resulted in a
 considerable  number of fatalities.
  It carries on in the non-informing way.
 In fact, that bomb resulted in at least 17
 deaths, not that you would know it, or
 the location from the report

This post deals with the first half of the war, up to the end of 1943; it is mainly focused on the Blitz (October 1940 - June 1941). Next week's installment covers the second half of the war - particularly the horrific V1 and V11 bombings.

West Ham Civil Defence statistics claim that although the first air raid was on the opening day of the war 3 September 1939, the first bomb did not land in Newham until almost a year later 28 August 1940.  ARP figures, however, indicate that the first bomb hit Forest Gate six months earlier! Just the first and most obvious lack of reconciliation between different bombing records and accounts.

These, admittedly less than reliable, Civil Defence statistics, suggest that there were a total of 1,227 air raid alerts affecting the borough and 194 actual raids. Many of the raids, of course, resulted in multiple bombings. They estimated that there were 3,221 hits in the borough; about a third of which were high explosive bombs, a third incendiary bombs and the remainder a variety of other missile devices - some of which remained unexploded.


The bombed interior of one of Forest
 Gate's then most recognizable landmarks,
 the former Methodist church building on
 Woodgrange Road. 

Their figures suggest that 1,207 West Ham civilians were killed in these raids, with 2,545 received hospitalisation and 3,322 received treatment at a first aid post. This is almost certainly an underestimate.

What follows is the ARP's listing of bomb incidents in Forest Gate, by date and location. In brackets and italics are the names of civilian fatalities identified by either the War Graves Commission or West Ham council's rolls of civilian dead most likely to have been the result of the bomb hit recorded.

Public spaces, or buildings identified in the records are presented in bold italics.

Using those figures, it can crudely be estimated that there were approximately 245 incendiary devices of different kinds dropped on Forest Gate during World War 11, and 124 Forest Gate civilians were killed during the war. 

But, for reasons explained above, we cannot deduce from this that 124 Forest Gate civilians were killed in the district during the war, or that only 124 people were killed in Forest Gate!

Contemporaneous photographs, and some Stratford Express reports have been inserted following details of some of the most significant bomb hits.

We are sure what follows is far from definitive, so would be delighted to receive any corrections or additional eye witness accounts from the surviving band of war time residents of the area - which we will happily append to this post, with full credit being given to the source (if they wish).

Next week - Part 2 - 1944 - 1945.


WW11 Forest Gate Bomb hits, by road
1940

March
29th - Latimer Road

June
29th - Gower Road

August
15th - Woodgrange

September
3rd - East London Cemetery

7th - Margery Park, Odessa, Sebert, Station Road, Wellington, Avenue Road, Upton Lane

8th - Upton Lane, Forest Street, Hampton, Latimer (Forest Gate Station)

9th - Osborne, Capel, Clova, Disraeli (Deaths: Ada Louisa Barnes, aged 40, 81 Disraeli; Ada Dorothy Barnes, aged 14, 81 Disraeli; Brenda Beach, aged 12 months, 81 Disraeli,;Dorothy Beach, aged 25, 81 Disraeli; Leonard Beach, aged 24, 81 Disraeli), Dunbar x 2, Upton Lane, Sebert, Wyatt (West Ham Cemetery)

10th - Romford x 2, Earlham Grove, Clova

16th - Sidney, Woodford x 4, Woodgrange, Dames, Forest Lane x 3

17th - Upton Lane

18th - Odessa, Ridley, Wellington

20th - Odessa, Sebert, Tower Hamlets (Deaths: Alice Scott, aged 69, 140 Tower Hamlets Road; Isabella Scott, aged 34, 140 Tower Hamlets Road, William Scott, aged 44, 140 Tower Hamlets Road), Wellington

23rd - Cranmer, Hampton, Odessa x 2 (Deaths: Elizabeth Clarke, aged 46, 29 Odessa; George Clarke, aged 46, 29 Odessa; Harry Clarke, aged 14, 29 Odessa; Lily Clarke, aged 8, 29 Odessa; Arthur Clayden, aged 37, 29 Odessa; Lily Clayden, aged 8, 29 Odessa; Margaret Clayden, aged 8, 29 Odessa; Mary Clayden, aged 67, 29 Odessa; Annie Hopgood, aged 26, 23 Odessa), Upton Lane

24th - Capel, Disraeli, Clova (Deaths: George Hamer, aged 87, 70 Clova; George Frederick Hamer, aged 56, 70 Clova; Mary Hamer, aged 79, 70 Clova; Cecil Partridge, aged 52, 68 Clova Road; Daisy Partridge, aged 56, 68 Clova Road; Hubert Partridge, aged 42, 68 Clova Road; Lilian Partridge, 68 Clova Road), Romford (Upton Lane School)(Death: Ronald Harris, aged 17, 32 Wellington)

28th - Windsor


The top of Windsor Road after the bombing,
 and the debris had been cleared
29th - Knox, Skelton


Communal grave of early air raid casualties,
 established September 1940 in East London Cemetery
October
1st - Sprowston (East London Cemetery)

2nd - Forest Lane, Odessa, Woodford (Forest Gate Hospital : Death: Elizabeth Sinclair, aged 61 at FG Hospital, Wanstead Flats)

4th - Hampton (Deaths: Hilda Humphreys, aged 23, 73 Hampton Road; Joyce Humphries, aged 23, 73 Hampton Road), Latimer

7th - Nursery Lane

8th - East London Cemetery, Dames

9th - St James', Romford x 3, Balmoral, Odessa (Forest Gate Hospital)

14th - Earlham Grove, Sebert, Station Road, Romford, Woodgrange

15th - Dames, Forest Lane, Leonard, Vansitart (East London Cemetery, West Ham Cemetery, Forest Gate Hospital) Deaths: Mrs Sabbon, aged 62, 102 Earlham Grove. (In October 2021 this site received an update on this reference from the Great Grand-daughter of "Mrs Sabbon", who offers a fascinating insight. The deceased's name, in fact was Mrs Loetitia Sablon, the widow of Charles Sablon. Mrs Sablon's son, naturally, remembered the incident well and told his family that his mother had refused to go to an air-raid shelter on the night of the bombing, when the signal was given. He and she were sheltering under the table in their home when the bomb dropped. It took a day for the rescuers to uncover him, when they took him straight to hospital. By the time he was discharged, his mother had already been buried. Her death certificate had already been issued with inaccuracies, including the mis-spelled name "Sabbon" on it, with no first name for the deceased or her former husband inserted. The son formally corrected the certificate three months later, giving the deceased's full, proper, name as Loetitia Amelie Sablon, aged 67 - not 62, as originally cited - and naming her former husband as Charles Sablon. We are happy to record this correction, and are left wondering how many more Home Front war-time deaths were similarly orginally mis-recorded.)

16th - East London Cemetery

17th - Dean

18th - Sebert

22nd - Upton

27th - Romford

28th - Glen Parke

November
15th - (Death: Charles William Bryant, 67, an APR of 1 Dunbar Rd, killed Royal Albert Dock)

18th - Dunbar, Upton Lane x 3, Skelton

23rd - Ridley

December
3rd - Odessa, Sylvan, Whytevlille, Romford x 4, Woodgrange, Upton Lane, x 2, Kitchener x 2, Knox, Glen Parke, Gower, Green Street, Chaucer x 2, Claremont, Disraeli x 3, Earlham Grove, Clova x 3 (Emmanuel Church)

4th - Clova

9th - Margery Park, St James, Tower Hamlets, Whyatt, Romford x 7, Clova, Crosby, Earlham Grove x 4, Leonard, Upton Lane (Forest Gate Hospital, Upton Lane School)


 
What at the time was the maternity hospital on
 Forest Lane, after one of the six hits,
 in total it received during the war 
19th - Odessa, Forest Lane

29th - Upton Lane

1941

January
11th - Disraeli

19th - (Forest Gate Police Station)

29th - Clova, Osborne, Green Street

March
8th/9th - Claremont x 3, Forest Gate Station,  Vale, Romford x 3, Vale (East London Cemetery)

19th - Wellington, Windsor, Talbot, Sidney, Knox, Hampton, Green Street x 3, Clova, Bignold, Atherton (Godwin School)

20th - Eric Road (Deaths: Albert Clements, aged 15, 25 Eric Road; Joyce Clements, 12, 25 Eric; Sarah Louise Clements, aged 52, 25 Eric; Ivy Denham, aged 26, Eric; Elizabeth Goddard, aged 70, 19 Eric; Frederick Ellis, 41, 161 Station Road; Alfred Middlehurst, aged 35, 20 Eric Road; Babrara Murrell, aged 2, 24 Eric Road; Doris Murrell, aged 18, 24 Eric Road; Dorothy Murrell, aged 13, 24 Eric Road; Rose Murrell, aged 16, 24 Eric Road; Susan Murrell, aged 46, 24 Eric Road; Thomas Murrell, aged 20, 24 Eric Road; Elizabeth Spooner, aged 51, 22 Eric Road; Annie Tallintire, aged 53, 21 Eric Road; Betty Tallintire, aged 14, 21 Eric Road; Charles Tallintire, aged 65, ARP stretcher bearer, 21 Eric Road)


Iconic photograph of Eric Road after
 the bomb. It is a small side
 road, just off Station Road

Parachute mine, of the kind that hit Eric Road
April

8th - Sebert (Godwin school)


Godwin school, after 1941 bombing
16th - Ridley

17th - Woodgrange (Methodist Church)(Deaths: Lucy Bruce, aged 68, 5 Claremont; William Bruce, aged, 68, 5 Claremont; Myer Cash, aged 65, 6 Claremont; Rosetta Cohen, aged 23, 3 Claremont;  Ruth Cohen, aged 19, 3 Claremont)


Above the bomb damaged Methodist
 church on Woodgrange Road

Once more, the Stratford Express
 report is very vague about location or
 details, but it probably refers,
 in very vague terms to the
 bombing of the church, which
is vaguely mentioned in the third
 paragraph in a small article,
 the week after the hit.

18th - Romford

19th - Earlham Grove x 3, Romford (Princess Alice Pub)


Bomb site left where original Princess Alice
 pub stood, junction of Romford and Woodgrange Roads
20th - Margery Park (Deaths: Herbert Kaye, aged 60, 1 Woodgrange Road)

29th - Romford (Queen's cinema)


Queen's cinema, soon after 29 April bomb
December
9th - Margery Park

1942

July
27th - Vansitart

1943

January
17th - Palmerstone, Romford (Death: Ronald Kirby, aged 18, a firewatcher)

18th - (Forest Gate Station)

March
3rd - (Forest Gate Hospital)