The
congregation and pastors of Woodgrange Methodist church, together with the
national hierarchy of the Methodist tradition have been working, for about 5
years, on redevelopment plans for the site.
These are at an advanced stage and subject to pre-planning consultation.
Architect view of how the new development would fit in to Woodgrange Road - nb, this assumes the proposals for 39a-49a - opposite - go ahead as approved |
The
existing buildings, although only about 60 years old, are looking tired and
unfit for purpose, so the Methodists have appointed a series of external
professionals to help them re-develop their physical position within the local
community.
They
held two consultation sessions - totalling eight hours - within the church
premises, over a cold February weekend. We went along, and this is what we
found.
The
consultation event was fronted by Alaistair Watson of Broadchurch Asset
Management - about whom, more much later.
The
proposal is to knock down the existing church and supporting buildings and
replace them by a new church and around 33 flats. The consultation leaflet said
that the proposed development will provide:
- a new high quality visible church on the northern side of the site
- variety of community spaces
- around 33 new homes
- retail accommodation
Bird's eye view of how the proposed development would appear |
Mr
Watson promised copies of the display boards on show at the consultation event
to share with readers of this blog. He
has failed to honour this commitment, despite repeated reminders and requests.
As and when he chooses to do so, we will happily update this post and add them
to it.
Only
about 25 people had attended the consultation event half way through its
opening hours, so few members of the local community will have had much of a
chance to see what is proposed for one of the focal points of the local
community.
The original Methodist church, built at the conclusion of construction of the Woodgrange estate - in the early 1890's. The new proposals seek a similarly dominating tower/spire |
This
literally towers over other buildings in the area, and may now be deemed out of
character - even with the taller residential apartment buildings planned for
the opposite side of Woodgrange Road (see here).
The original church, in ruins, following bombing during WW2 |
The
church, itself, will occupy about 50% of the land on the site - the other 50%
will be devoted to housing. Mr Watson was frank - 'it is the sale of the flats
that will pay for the rebuilding of the church'. But, the proposals only
anticipate that 6 of the proposed flats will be for 'social housing'. The other
27 would be for sale.
The
consultation leaflet stated that further information about the proposed
development could be found here. At
the time of writing, this website offered no more information than the leaflet
available at the consultation event, other than the information that "The
site will be developed by Pigeon Investment Management."
Pigeon's
website: www.pigeon.co.uk says:
Pigeon was established in 2008 and has
assembled a management team with extensive knowledge of the regional property
markets and a powerful combination of business and property skills.
Pigeon manages commercial and
residential property on behalf of its investors with a projected end value of
over £250m and is currently promoting land for over 15,000 dwellings for its
land partners.
Herein
lies a potential problem for both the developers (Pigeon and Broadchurch) and
for would-be Newham Labour Mayoral hopeful Cllr Rokhsana Fiaz. Cllr Fiaz, in
her manifesto for mayor plan, aims to get 50% of new-build homes in Newham
under council ownership and let at fair rents.
The church, today, occupying space the developers propose is used for 33 flats - 80% for sale at market prices |
Clearly
both ambitions - the 80% flats for commercial sale proposals of the developers
and 50% council-owned by the potential mayor - cannot be met, unless weasel
words can be conjured up.
The
rebuild proposals would see the church side of the development as a large
multi-purpose space that could be used to host a number of community
activities, and open up to make it an inviting facility for local community
use.
The
Grade 2 listed Peter Peri's sculpture, The Preacher, (see here for details), currently facing
Woodgrange Road would be relocated to face the corner of Woodgrange and Osborne
Roads in the new proposals.
Peter Peri's sculpture will be moved, but remain as a significant feature of the new church - under current proposals |
There
were a number of elderly members of the local congregation present at the
consultation event and they are very keen on the proposals. "We pray every day for their
success" we were told.
They
were keen to point out that they do not want the new development to have walls
or fences around it - both from a perspective of being welcoming to the local
community, but also because they do not wish it to become a centre of
anti-social behaviour (litter dumping, street drinking, needle discards etc).
Mr
Watson said all concerned were working to what sounds like an incredibly
ambitious time table. Planning permission within two-three months and project
completion with about 18 months. The congregation would co-locate with the
Manor Park Methodists for the duration.
Alaistair Watson and Broadchurch Asset
Management
The
consultation event was hosted by Mr Watson, in the name of Broadchurch Asset
Management.
The company's name is a potentially misleading
one, because in financial circles "Asset Management" companies are
those who look after/invest large holdings of other people's money - like
pension and sovereign wealth funds. Broadchurch is small beer - with almost no
assets - either of its own, or apparently managing.
Alaistair
Watson, 53, is the only current director of Broadchurch-am, which was
established in 2013, and doesn't appear to have done much trading since. He has
been involved with a string of other property companies (33 at the last count -
though only currently active in 4) and has been involved with projects in
Essex, the Isle of Wight (see ,here and here) and Suffolk, where he lives. He appears to be a bit of a vintage car enthusiast (see here).
Broadchurch,
together with Pigeon, do, however, have plans for a significant development in
Hadleigh in Suffolk - see here.
In
2005, under the name of Thamesgate Regeneration, Mr Watson managed a big and
controversial development in East Tilbury. It attracted a fair bit
of press coverage, not least from The Guardian, due to its plans to build a 14,000-home new town on greenbelt
land.
Colonnade Holdings, another company managed Mr Watson, has run a few successful projects in the Isle of Wight over the last decade or so. But he and this company didn’t have a good time of it when developing a shopping centre in Basildon in 2009, according to three separate reports in the local paper (see here, here and here).
Some of the filth currently outside the church. The congregation, and local people want to see an end to this. Mr Watson - please note |
The congregation at
Woodgrange Methodist church, and Forest Gate residents more generally, will be
disappointed to hear that there were complaints were about filth, rubbish,
graffiti and broken pavements in the area under development, causing accidents
and discomfort, for which Mr Watson had to publicly apologise.
October 2018 update
A formal planning application for the redevelopment of the Woodgrange Methodist church was lodged at the end of September 2018. Full details can be found on the council's planning website, see here.
Below are some of the drawing submitted as part of the application.
Comments about the application are sought by the council, via the site, above, with a closing date of 31 October 2018.
Some observations:
1. Five weeks does not seem long for the consultation process - particularly considering how minimal the first stage of consultation was - see above.
2. The diagrams below disguise the fact that if accepted, a key part of Forest Gate's main thoroughfare (the flats in this proposal and those in the boarded up shops opposite - whenever the developers get round to building) will switch from being effectively three floors high, to six floors high. This is a significant change to the nature of the area, which the council has failed to consult on, adequately.
3. As mentioned, above, weasel words have been conjured up to disguise the fact that the proposal falls considerably short of Newham's mayor's stated aim of ensuring all new housing developments in Newham are split 50:50 between commercially let and sold properties and those that are "affordable". The proposal, like the original consulted-on scheme, still envisages only 6 of the 33 homes being for "social housing", and 27 not (i.e about 18% social/affordable).
4. All the evidence suggests that 3-bedroom accommodation presents the largest demand for housing in Newham. Only six of the proposed flats are 3-bed, nine are 2-bed and 18 are 1-bed.
5. The planning proposals envisages that the building costs of the development will be £10.5m, bringing the equivalent of 97 labour-years of work.
Some observations:
1. Five weeks does not seem long for the consultation process - particularly considering how minimal the first stage of consultation was - see above.
2. The diagrams below disguise the fact that if accepted, a key part of Forest Gate's main thoroughfare (the flats in this proposal and those in the boarded up shops opposite - whenever the developers get round to building) will switch from being effectively three floors high, to six floors high. This is a significant change to the nature of the area, which the council has failed to consult on, adequately.
3. As mentioned, above, weasel words have been conjured up to disguise the fact that the proposal falls considerably short of Newham's mayor's stated aim of ensuring all new housing developments in Newham are split 50:50 between commercially let and sold properties and those that are "affordable". The proposal, like the original consulted-on scheme, still envisages only 6 of the 33 homes being for "social housing", and 27 not (i.e about 18% social/affordable).
4. All the evidence suggests that 3-bedroom accommodation presents the largest demand for housing in Newham. Only six of the proposed flats are 3-bed, nine are 2-bed and 18 are 1-bed.
5. The planning proposals envisages that the building costs of the development will be £10.5m, bringing the equivalent of 97 labour-years of work.
Ground floor plan |
Church development plan's height in comparison to agreed development for 39a - 49a Woodgrange Road |
Current building footprint (solid colour), within site plans for new development (purple line) |
Top view of proposed development |
View from Claremont Road |
View from Osborne Road |
Woodgrange Road, looking east |
The site clearly needs developing. But the there are two obvious problems around the scale of the church tower. Firstly being the taller element in the proposal it will mask the fact that the residential component will not be criticized for what it is: out of scale with the surrounding area. Secondly, and most importantly, the church tower sets a dangerous precedent for tall buildings in Forest Gate. Any future tower (it wasn't very long ago that towers were being proposed in Forest Gate) will make reference to this church tower as a justification for height. The consented development across the road is about as high as is appropriate for a location like this. I'm concerned that any tall elements on the Methodist Church site will be used to justify tall and out of scale development on the Durning Hall site when it finally gets developed.
ReplyDeleteHave you contacted the head of the Nursery School about the loss of light etc?
ReplyDeleteI hope after they have redeveloped all of woodgrange road there won't be any bookies left and Newham council does not extend their licences, then perhaps all the undesirables will leave with them. Maybe forest gate will then become the place we will all enjoy living in again.
ReplyDelete